Claim Denial Types—Medical Necessity: What is it?

By Greg Alllenbach

Because insurance companies can deny your medical or mental health claims for a myriad of reasons, the process of appealing those denials is usually an arduous and confusing one.

DMI facilitates families going through this process; it is our job to make sure that your insurance claims are submitted correctly, and once they are received by the insurance company, we want to make sure they are responded to fairly and accurately.

We see many reasons for claim denials, whether the insurance company states that there is a plan exclusion, timely filing issues, that specific services are not a covered benefit, or that they find the services rendered to be “experimental.”

One of the most common denial reason we see is called, Medical Necessity.

So what is Medical Necessity?

The client receives a denial letter from their insurance company that reads similar to, “Upon clinical review, the patient doesn’t meet the plan’s criteria for medical necessity.” In most cases, this statement will be followed by another that states that the patient could have been treated at a lower level of care.

Essentially, what they are saying is that the treatment you or your loved one was, or are, receiving, does not meet a certain level of severity to be considered medically important enough to warrant that treatment.

This is a very frustrating response to the families we serve, who send their child hundreds, sometimes thousands, of miles away from home for the appropriate—and oft times life-saving and recommended—treatment, only to be told by a faceless individual that the care they have sought for their loved one is, in fact, not a medical necessity. It’s like being told, “you are overreacting.” To make matters worse, in just about every single case we have handled, the family has sought many other levels and types of care over an extended period of time before making the difficult decision to admit their child to the program in question.

Medical Necessity denials can be discouraging, and in most cases, families end up paying out of pocket due to a lack of understanding. But here’s the rub: only about 20 percent of denials are ever appealed, meaning the insurance companies unjustly, and needlessly, benefit almost 80 percent of the time.

Medical Necessity denials constitute the majority of the cases we see. We are extremely well-versed and adept at building strong arguments against this type of denial; and having our Healthcare Advocates work hand in hand with the families is part and parcel in our ability to do this so successfully.

When you first begin working with our Healthcare Advocates they will need several documents from you. Probably one of the most important documents of all is a chronological history: a detailed time line from the family’s perspective, highlighting all—or as much as possible—the incidents and behaviors that led to the patient’s treatment in question. We understand that these written histories can be difficult to create because it can often lead to reliving provocative and traumatic experiences, but these chronologies really are the cornerstone to building the strongest possible case. It is important to provide these chronologies as promptly as possible, as they will help your advocate in their research, bequeath insight, and lend a hand as to what other documentation will be needed or helpful. We will present you with examples of what we look for and need in a chronological history, and are capable of answering any questions you may have as to what information is pertinent and what is not.

Medical Necessity denials also open up the possibility of the External Level of Appeal, which is performed by an Independent Review Board (IRO). There is protocol, however, in order to reach this level of appeal.

  • One must Fulfill all internal levels of appeals, which are reviewed by your insurance company. Normally, there are two levels of internal appeals, depending on the appeal rights outlined by your insurance company. This can vary, though, depending on the company.

Families then have two options once they’ve exhausted the internal level of appeals:

  1. IRO
  2. Litigation

The IRO (external review board) is a team of reviewers comprised of medical professionals with no affiliation with insurance companies, nor do they have any fiscal bias as to whether or not claims are paid or denied. Generally, this is where appeals are given the full, fair, and objective review that families and patients deserve; and conversely, where we see the most denials overturned.

However, going the IRO route can be a double-side blade: if the IRO review board upholds the denial, there will be yet another clinical denial letter attached to the case, which may alter a settlement should the family subsequently seek litigation. In some cases, choosing to move forward with an IRO will make it impossible to later litigate, as an IRO denial may dissuade an attorney from even taking your case. Your advocate is knowledgeable, knows the lay of the land, as it were, and can advise you accordingly whether it is best to seek an IRO or go straight to litigation. Keeping an open line of communication with your Healthcare Advocate is the very first step in fighting against your wrongly denied claims.



1 Comment

  1. Dana Malsom

    The core of your writing whilst sounding agreeable in the beginning, did not really sit perfectly with me personally after some time. Somewhere throughout the sentences you managed to make me a believer but only for a very short while. I however have a problem with your jumps in assumptions and one would do well to help fill in those gaps. In the event you can accomplish that, I will undoubtedly be amazed.


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *